<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tense times in Bingham Township</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/2008/11/20/tense-times-in-bingham-township/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/2008/11/20/tense-times-in-bingham-township/</link>
	<description>Serving Carrboro and Surrounding Communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:25:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John McGuire</title>
		<link>http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/2008/11/20/tense-times-in-bingham-township/comment-page-1/#comment-98638</link>
		<dc:creator>John McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/?p=4014#comment-98638</guid>
		<description>Two points:
The first regards Commissioner Carey&#039;s comments that a common-sense look at the process and requirements now would cause citizens to question the board&#039;s capabilities.  I think that point is long past.  Initially the project was to continue at the Eubanks Road site, but since has done nothing but follow the path of least resistance, no matter what results of the technical, economic, and environmental studies concluded.

The second point is the false assumption from the board of the need to have a transfer station in place when the land fill closes.  There are other alternatives such as under-utilized facilities in neighboring communities that can serve as a stop-gap until the county can make a complete and fair study of all options.

This entire process has definitely been a case of the cart leading the horse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two points:<br />
The first regards Commissioner Carey&#8217;s comments that a common-sense look at the process and requirements now would cause citizens to question the board&#8217;s capabilities.  I think that point is long past.  Initially the project was to continue at the Eubanks Road site, but since has done nothing but follow the path of least resistance, no matter what results of the technical, economic, and environmental studies concluded.</p>
<p>The second point is the false assumption from the board of the need to have a transfer station in place when the land fill closes.  There are other alternatives such as under-utilized facilities in neighboring communities that can serve as a stop-gap until the county can make a complete and fair study of all options.</p>
<p>This entire process has definitely been a case of the cart leading the horse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tense times in Bingham Township &#171; Rogers-Eubanks Coalition</title>
		<link>http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/2008/11/20/tense-times-in-bingham-township/comment-page-1/#comment-98623</link>
		<dc:creator>Tense times in Bingham Township &#171; Rogers-Eubanks Coalition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/?p=4014#comment-98623</guid>
		<description>[...] (read the whole story and comments here)       Blogroll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (read the whole story and comments here)       Blogroll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
