Apr 11, 2007 News Jump to Comments
The Chapel Hill-Carrboro school board was scheduled to settle on a redistricting plan Thursday that would move roughly more than 1,000 elementary students
The plan (above), 9D, has been recommended to the board by school officials. Click the map for a larger image.
UPDATE:
After more than three hours of public comment and discussion, the school board on Thursday voted to revise plan 9D and remove all other plans from consideration. Board members Mike Kelley, Lisa Stuckey and Jean Hamilton will work with Steve Scroggs, superintendent for support services, to tweak plan 9D and address some of the issues raised by the public at the meeting.
The board will consider the revised plan 9D at their regular meeting on May 3.
By Susan Dickson
Staff Writer
Nearly 500 Chapel Hill-Carrboro elementary school students, mostly from the northwestern corner of the school district, will move to a new elementary school when it opens in the fall of 2008.
On Thursday, the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Board of Education is expected to approve one of four redistricting plans to move students to the new school. Under the plan recommended by school officials, 1,095 students would be moved to different elementary schools, including 481 to the new school, which has yet to be named but has been dubbed Elementary No. 10 by school officials. The new school will be located at the corner of Dromoland Road and Eubanks Road.
Board members discussed the four plans at their March 15 meeting and asked school officials to revise plans and make recommendations. Steve Scroggs, superintendent of support services, said, “We felt like we had direction from the board to look at two basic models,” one that would protect Carrboro Elementary School’s dual-language program and another that would preserve balance across all criteria.
Scroggs said the recommended plan, labeled plan 9D, attempts to balance criteria including school capacity, student proficiency, the number of students receiving free and reduced lunch and socio-economic status. Of the four plans, he said 9D has the best balance in each of those categories as well as the shortest driving distances, with most students attending the school closest or second-closest to them.
“9[D] clearly is the one that balances the board’s criteria the best, there’s no question about that one,” Scroggs said.
Plan 3F best supports the dual-language program, but according to Scroggs, he was unable to put 120 native Spanish speakers at Carrboro, which school officials had requested.
Under the dual-language program’s model, 50 percent of the enrolled students must be native Spanish speakers. Scroggs said that while plan 9D does not increase the number of native Spanish speakers at Carrboro, the number of native Spanish speakers at the school does not decline under the plan.
Scroggs said he thinks the board should look at options other than redistricting for expanding the base of the dual-language program. “There are other possibilities out there.”
School officials also revised the two other plans. Plan 2LL attempts to move the fewest students, and plan 27 attempts to protect the dual-language program while leaving room for growth at the new elementary school. The number of students moved ranges from 965 to 1,157 across the four plans.
Board member Mike Kelley said he would probably support either 9D or 3F. “There are many different considerations when you’re looking at any of these plans.”
Kelley said he thinks it is important to keep communities together and close to their schools, “especially for people without ready access to a car.”
He added that while population balance is important for all the schools, special considerations “to some extent” should be given to Carrboro Elementary.
“It’s a very, very difficult decision because not everyone is going to get their choice,” Kelley said. He added that the redistricting efforts are increasingly more difficult because “we’re dividing the puzzle into smaller and smaller pieces.”
“It’s a tough decision for the board because you are disrupting 1,095 kids,” Scroggs said.
“Nobody wants to change schools,” he said. “I’ve got to get a new school building open.”
Segments moved under the proposed plan include:
Post Your Comment